CrewPayScan is testing whether a narrow workflow can help teams screen payment-related names, review possible matches, and keep clearer internal evidence. The technology and reporting approach will be shaped by private-preview feedback.
Sanctions data coverage to validate
The preview is exploring which sanctions lists and update patterns matter most for crew payment review, including common references such as OFAC, EU, and UK lists.
Name matching under review
Beneficiary and bank names can vary across files and systems. The private preview will help tune how possible matches are surfaced for human review.
Review statuses that match real work
We are validating whether statuses such as reviewed, false positive, and needs follow-up reflect how maritime teams actually document decisions.
Sample audit evidence
The sample report is meant to test what internal evidence would be useful. It is not a guarantee of regulator acceptance or production compliance readiness.